European Primary Care Cardiovascular Society

The mortality risk associated with sedentary behavior can be offset by much physical activity

Sitting Time, Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality in Adults

Literature - Stamatakis E, Gale J, Bauman A et al., - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(16), DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.031

Scroll down to participate in the poll

Introduction and methods

The benefits of physical activity (PA) are well-established and include the prevention, management and treatment of CV disease. At the lowest end of the physical activity spectrum, we see sedentary behavior (SB), which is commonly defined as low energy expenditure, of <1.5 metabolic equivalents (MET) in a sitting or reclining posture during waking hours [1].

Several studies have studied the effect of sitting time on CVD, while taking into account PA [2,3]. A drawback of the studies to date is, however, that they did not take into account that an increase in any type of activity will mean a decrease of time spent on another activity.

Due to the lack of evidence on the health-enhancing potential of PA alternatives to sitting, guidelines on SB are currently nonspecific and not always evidence-based. This study aimed to address this evidence gap, by examining the joint associations of sitting and PA with all-cause mortality (ACM) and CVD mortality in a large population sample of middle-age and older Australian adults. The theoretical effects of replacing sitting with standing, PA and sleep on mortality were estimated as a secondary aim. Data from the 45 and Up Study [4] were used, a large prospective cohort of men and women of 45 years and older (n=267.119). They completed a questionnaire about their usual activities at baseline, from January 2006 through December 2009.

The core analytic sample consisted of 149.077 participants. Median follow-up for ACM was 8.9 years (1.355.574 person-years [PY]), in which 8689 deaths occurred. Median follow-up for CVD mortality was 7.4 years (1.144.279 PY), with 1.644 deaths.

Main results

Joint and stratified associations of sitting and PA with mortality risk

Replacement effects of sitting time with physical activity, standing and sleep

Conclusion

Via a comprehensive analytic approach that took into account effects of both PA and sitting, as well as replacement effects, this study found that higher sitting times were associated with higher risk of all-cause and CV death, mostly restricted to those not meeting PA recommendations. Meeting the lower PA recommendation (150-299 min/week), by walking and VPA, eliminated the association of sitting with ACM risk.

The sitting level seemed to modify the magnitude of the associations between intensity of PA and mortality risk: for instance, replacing sitting by standing was beneficial in low-sitters, but had no effect in those who sit >6 h/day. The largest replacement effects were seen for VPA, while those of MPA were less consistent.

Editorial comment

Matthews [5] applauds the efforts of Stamatakis and colleagues to extend our understanding of the interplay among sitting, PA and mortality and to ‘probe for the level of PA required to minimize the risks linked to too much sitting.’ He finds the joint-analysis results ‘particularly important because they shed light on how 20 different sitting-MVPA combinations may influence longevity.’ At recommended levels of MVPA (150-299 min/week), overall risk of ACM decreased as compared to less active adults, but those who sat >8 h/day were still at increased risk. This excess risk in high-sitters was only eliminated at >300 min/week MVPA. This is just above the current US recommendation of 150-300 min/week, but much above what the majority of Americans report to achieve.

Matthews translates the results of Stamatakis to three opportunities of lowering risk of early mortality for those who do not exercise at all and sit >8 h/day:

  • Increase PA to the recommended 150-299 min/week without changes in sitting time. Some residual risk may remain due to too much sitting.
  • Reduce sitting time to <4 h/day, without increasing MVPA. Some residual risk may remain due to physical inactivity
  • Increase MVPA to recommended levels and reduce sitting time to <8 h/day. The results suggest this gives greater benefits than the first two options.

The recently published PA guidelines for Americans also focus more on sitting less and moving more. This is increasingly important, ‘given that sedentary behaviors appear to be vastly outcompeting more healthy PA behavior during our discretionary time’.

References

Show references

Find this article online at JACC

Do you encourage patients to sit less and move more (when appropriate)?

  • Yes
  • No

Share this page with your colleagues and friends: